Articles

Some object to Christianity by saying God or some higher power cannot be understood because He or it is too far beyond our understanding. However, this is a self-defeating objection for he/she claims to understand/know something about the apparently unknowable higher power.

Thus, my response to the many comments asserting the Bible can't be used as evidence for the resurrection of Jesus is that they are wrong. The historical documents contained in the Bible comprise the best-supported sources from ancient times. One is free to reject the claims of the Bible (i.e., miracles), but to assert one cannot use it as evidence for investigating historical claims it makes is baseless (not even non-Christian scholars take this position).

Miracles do not violate the laws of nature. This can be understood when properly defining "miracles" and the "laws of nature."