Articles

Many critics dismiss the moral argument for God by appealing to alternative explanations for objective morality. But are mere possibilities enough to defeat a sound deductive argument? In Part 1 of this series on objections to the moral argument, we examine the key distinction between possibility and plausibility—and why skeptics must offer more than hypothetical alternatives to undermine the moral argument for the existence of God.

In today’s diverse world, discussing faith can often feel daunting. Many individuals shy away from engaging in conversations about God and spirituality, fearing conflict or misunderstanding. However, as highlighted in the latest episode of the Truthful Hope podcast, these discussions are not only necessary but also rooted in love and care for others. Join hosts Jacob Vazquez and Steve Washington as they explore practical strategies for effective apologetics in everyday conver

Explore what Scripture truly teaches about heaven, hell, and eternal judgment, addressing the growing popularity of annihilationism and universalism.

Discover the Transcendental Argument for God: why logic, morality, and reason require God. Rooted in reformed apologetics and Cornelius Van Til’s thought, this approach examines the foundations of truth, ethics, and reasoning, showing how unbelieving worldviews borrow from God to make sense of reality.

Some object to Christianity by saying God or some higher power cannot be understood because He or it is too far beyond our understanding. However, this is a self-defeating objection for he/she claims to understand/know something about the apparently unknowable higher power.

Thus, my response to the many comments asserting the Bible can't be used as evidence for the resurrection of Jesus is that they are wrong. The historical documents contained in the Bible comprise the best-supported sources from ancient times. One is free to reject the claims of the Bible (i.e., miracles), but to assert one cannot use it as evidence for investigating historical claims it makes is baseless (not even non-Christian scholars take this position).

Miracles do not violate the laws of nature. This can be understood when properly defining "miracles" and the "laws of nature."

Remember, faith isn’t a call to abandon reason; it’s an invitation to engage with it.

The abortion debate comes down to one vital question: what is the preborn? Given the preborn are human beings, abortion is morally wrong.

The most comprehensive response to the problem of evil is an integrated approach called the Christocentric harmonized theodicy.

Scientific naturalism overlooks key aspects of reality, such as morality, meaning, and human reasoning, which Christianity better addresses.

Why emphasize hope? Hope is desperately needed in our culture. We aim to provide reasons for trusting in the Living Hope—Jesus.

Christian Apologetics is the defense of the Christian faith which can be used to remove barriers for others to accept the Gospel readily.