Articles

Thus, my response to the many comments asserting the Bible can't be used as evidence for the resurrection of Jesus is that they are wrong. The historical documents contained in the Bible comprise the best-supported sources from ancient times. One is free to reject the claims of the Bible (i.e., miracles), but to assert one cannot use it as evidence for investigating historical claims it makes is baseless (not even non-Christian scholars take this position).

Scientific naturalism overlooks key aspects of reality, such as morality, meaning, and human reasoning, which Christianity better addresses.